MARKETING INSIGHTS: All Your Eggs in the Online Basket
Monday, September 24, 2007 by Bob Chernet
Have you been watching the Dow Jones? Wow, talk about a wild ride; just when you think you’ve taken a bath, the bulls rush in and you’ve made a pile of cash! So, whatever your market strategy, do you feel safe placing all your dollars on a single stock? Think of it, if you hit it big with the right stock, it would be like winning the lottery!Unfortunately, the hard part is picking the right stock at the right time.
Why do I bring this up? Well, I’m going to talk about a potentially unpopular opinion about putting all your marketing attention and weight into online media (loading your budgets into one stock.) Right now everyone is caught-up with the new technologies of the Web and wireless, and everyone has to jump onboard. You’ve heard the rationale:
- “You can geo-target…”
- “You can segment your audience to a granular level…”
- “Spend your budget very efficiently”
- “Obtain metrics from first click to purchase”
- “Target by lifestyle and interest
Absolutely. Every statement here is true, and there are many more. However, generally speaking, I believe (as in anything) marketing / advertising requires yin and yang; a harmonic balance. No end-all extremes if you want to do an effective job. Let’s look at a few reasons why:
Everybody is online, all the time.
Of course, online (by that I mean Internet, wireless, mobile phone etc) use is big and it’s growing. But sometimes we pay too much attention to first-adopters (look at the iPhone) or twenty-somethings that use this technology. Sure they have disposable income, but not as much as the 40, 50 or 60-somethings who still prefer “traditional” media for a lot of their interaction.
I’ve made trips around the country recently where literally everyone I talked with (30 - 60 age group) expressed that they are still ignorant about new technology. Certainly there are exceptions to the rule, but for the most part if all you’re doing to reach that audience (read: luxury cars, vacation homes, travel, clothing and other high-ticket items etc.) is paid search, eMail blasts or viral marketing you may be missing a rather large audience.
Sure, that age demo uses the Web, but they also like to read magazines, watch cable television, and open up direct mail.
Traditional media is dying
I don’t think so. Are they having trouble? Sure, but so are current Internet companies. For one, I believe newspaper and television entities need to understand how to exist in today’s world. Why would I buy a newspaper that offers yesterday’s headlines, when I can get the most up-to-date information online? (Believe it or not, there are some people who don’t want to boot-up their PC to read the headlines at breakfast.)
So, traditional media are being forced to figure out how to co-exist in today’s turbulent media landscape. Are they doing that? Consider:
Recently the New York Times announced that it was abandoning its paid online content subscription model for one of free access. Time magazine is going to start guaranteeing printed circulation issue-by-issue. NBC announced it will begin permitting free downloads of its TV programs.
As with anything, the model is changing so rapidly its hard to understand how you need to change. The marketplace is calling the shots and for once big media is being forced to try something, anything to maintain share.
But the big bucks are still being spent in traditional media. It’s still big business. And it still works.
Depending on what you’re marketing, and who your target demo is, you can include traditional media with confidence. It supports your online efforts, and even adds a level of credibility.
They said the same thing about radio, upon the emergence of television. They said the same thing about television when cable appeared on the scene. They said the same thing about cable when satellite was launched. Yet, they all co-exist. That’s because they all have their purpose. Your media mix is like a recipe; if all you put in is flower then you’ll get a rather unappealing cake for most people.
Online is inexpensive
Sure, if you know what you’re doing.
It’s amazing to see how many of today’s businesses ad agencies just don’t get it. Good search ranking or proper paid placement may, indeed, carry a smaller media cost. However, unless you’re managing the campaign(s) yourself, there is some significant management time involved to optimize a site, create special landing pages, place tracking tags, research keywords, place pay-for-performance, monitor and adjust P4P result rankings, and track to ROI.
Now, don’t get upset! Online works. It’s part of what my company does on a daily basis. But the customers who come to us either don’t have the time to keep current on the never ending changes in the online ad world, or find the tactics too time-consuming. They “leave it to the pros.” After all, in traditional media, that’s why you have media buyers and managers.
Paying 13-cents for a keyword on GOOGLE is great. But if you include the research, prep, account(s) set-up, tracking, managing and reporting, it ain’t 13-cents anymore.
As you plan the marketing strategy for your next project or client, don’t automatically ignore complementary media. Think carefully about the intended audience. Create detailed audience profiles, and examine what their true habits are. Yes, some consumers are connected at the eyeballs to their wireless device. But they also see transit ads, or billboards. Verizon does a great job with their media mix. You can hardly go anywhere without seeing their simple message, “It’s the Network.”
For marketers, I would modify that claim just a bit to say, “It’s the Mix.”
Agree? Disagree? Have a success story? Have a question? Share it with me at: bob_chernet@viewmark.com
View a complete list of Bob’s Marketing Insights articles.
© 2007 Bob Chernet
Reproduction in any manner is unlawful, without the written permission of the author.
